Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Risk Management Division of Department of Finance & Administration v. Gathman-Matotan Architects & Planners, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. 5670 to 5672PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LOPEZ, Judge.

We consolidate the interlocutory appeals taken in State v. Gathman-Matotan and Urioste v. Warden of the Penitentiary of New Mexico. In each case, the various state parties alleged a cause of action for breach of implied warranty of sufficiency of plans and specifications against Gathman-Matotan Architects and Planners, Inc. (Gathman), and W.C. Kruger and Associates Architects-Planners, Inc. (Kruger). In both cases, the trial court dismissed the claims for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. We affirm.

In 1977, the New Mexico Department of Finance and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Borman's, Inc. v. Lake State Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bloomsburg Mills, Inc. v. Sordoni Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Broyles v. Brown Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Federal Mogul Corp. v. Universal Const. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies v. C.F. Murphy & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Sime v. Tvenge Associates Architects & Planners, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Trujillo v. BerryNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Adobe Masters, Inc. v. DowneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API