Legal Opinion
Wooley v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided November 16, 1999No. Civil Action G-97-506PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY OF DR. LANCE YARUS AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR LACK OF MEDICAL CAUSATION
KENT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this products liability action against Defendant Smith & Nephew Richard, Inc. (“S & N”) for personal injuries allegedly caused by pedicle bone screws used in Plaintiff Michael Wooley’s spinal fusion surgery. Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Lack of Medical Causation filed September 27, 1999.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Squires ex rel. Squires v. GoodwinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- Perkins v. Origin Medsystems Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.