Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Smith & Nephew, P.L.C.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 4, 2000No. 96-CV-1004-K(E)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KERN, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.’s (“Defendant’s”) motions for summary judgment and to exclude or limit the testimony of Jerry D. McKenzie, M.D., as to Plaintiff William Knight (“Plaintiff’).

I. History of Case

This is a products liability case concerning the Rogozinski Spinal Rod System manufactured by Defendant, presently on remand from In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, multidistrict litigation number 1014, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff is suing Defendant for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Darlene Thomas v. International Business MacHines a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hackett v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
  2. Ernest James Young, through Surviving Spouse Michelle Young and Daughter and Heir, Amanda Fries v. Sequoyah Fuels Corp. & Quivira Mining Corp.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. Lenexa 95 Partners, LLC v. Kin, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API