Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Origin Medsystems Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 14, 2004No. CIV.A.3:00 CV 1405 SPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DOCTOR METZ-GER’S STUDY AND PROFFERED OPINION TESTIMONY
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-572M et seq., Plaintiff Cynthia Perkins (“Ms.Perkins”) has brought a products liability action against defendant Origin Medsystems Inc. (“Origin”), the manufacturer of a surgical fastening device (“the Tacker”). 1 Ms. Perkins alleges that she has suffered injuries proximately caused by the use of the Tacker in her 1996 laparoscopic hernia operation. Plaintiff Mark Perkins asserts a claim for loss of consortium. 2 In support of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. GundersonKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
- McClellan v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- In Re Fosamax Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.