Legal Opinion

West v. Stainback

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1952No. Civ. 18355PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to impress a trust on a parcel of realty, the record title to which is in defendant, and to compel a conveyance thereof or to impose an equitable lien thereon. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, impressing a trust on the property and decreeing that plaintiff has an equitable lien thereon to the extent of $30,000. Both parties appeal from the judgment.

The Honorable Henry M. Willis, the trial judge, filed a memorandum opinion which is part of the record on appeal. (Rules on Appeal, rule 5a; 36 Cal.2d 1, 5.) Thereafter findings of fact and conclusions of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Esgro Central, Inc. v. General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Goldstein v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API