Simon v. Bemis Bros. Bag Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The purpose of this opinion is to demonstrate to appellant that under the rules of appellate procedure, the judgment now under review cannot be reversed. Not that its appeal is without merit, but because the law cannot alter its doctrines or its methods in determining whether any litigant has enjoyed a fair trial. These parties have submitted an acrid controversy to the arbitrament of reason under the guidance of long established principles. That the learned trial judge might with honor have decided for appellant is obvious upon a review of the record. But the flaming facts proved by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Scott v. NevisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Winick Corp. v. County Sanitation District No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Forthmann v. BoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Maple Properties v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.