Legal Opinion
Forthmann v. Boyer
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 2002No. B146996PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The appellant, John F. Boyer, an income beneficiary of the Rosanna Forthmann Testamentary Trust (hereafter the Trust), appeals from the trial court’s order approving the “Sixty-First Account Current” and report (for the year 1999; hereafter the 1999 Accounting) submitted by the cotrustees of the Trust. The current cotrustees are the respondents.
The trial court refused to grant Boyer an additional 210-day continuance of an already twice-continued hearing on the trustees’ petition for approval of the 1999 Accounting. Without filing any objections to the 1999 Accounting, Boyer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Angela G.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Miller v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.