Legal Opinion
Winick Corp. v. County Sanitation District No. 2
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 1986No. B013479PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ADLER, J. *
Respondent and defendant, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County (District) was granted summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) against plaintiff and appellant Winick Corporation (Winick) on the ground that plaintiff’s complaint presented no triable issues of fact and had no merit. This appeal is from that portion of the summary judgment which granted the District’s request for sanctions against Winick in the form of attorney’s fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 128.5 and 437c, subdivision (i). We affirm.
Facts
The District is a public agency…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Long Beach v. BozekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- 580 Folsom Associates v. Prometheus Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Summers v. City of Cathedral CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Knight v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.