Legal Opinion
Cappello v. Ciresi
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 29, 1996No. File CV93304238SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
The plaintiffs, Vincent R. Cappello and Irene M. Cappello, have brought this action to quiet and settle their title in real property pursuant to General Statutes § 47-31. They ask this court to declare invalid deed restrictions which prohibit them from using their property for business purposes. The defendants are the property owners who benefit from the restrictions. The issues were tried before this court. For the reasons stated below, this court denies the requested relief.
The parties own property in a subdivision in Fairfield known as Lakeview Acres. All the lots in the subdivision are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bickell v. MoraioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. KroghConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Dainty Rubbish Service, Inc. v. Beacon Hill Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Stueck v. G. C. Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Lomas and Nettleton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jepsen v. CamassarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Cappello v. CiresiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997