Legal Opinion
Albert Mendel & Son, Inc. v. Krogh
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 1985No. 2814PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendant appeals from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court ruled as to the evidence which could be introduced at a hearing to determine whether the plaintiff is qualified to be reissued a cattle dealer’s license.
In January, 1980, the defendant ordered the plaintiff to show cause why its cattle dealer’s license should not be revoked or suspended pursuant to General Statutes § 22-3861 for importing cattle into Connecticut *119without a permit and without the cattle being properly tested and certified as free of disease. A hearing was scheduled for February 25,1980. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- United States v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mazur v. BlumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- A. Dubreuil & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LisbonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- John T. Brady & Co. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Connecticut National Bank v. N. E. Owen II, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. ReckertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.