Legal Opinion

Bickell v. Moraio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1933PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants are the respective owners of certain lots in a real estate development in the town of Greenwich known as “Breezemont Park,” which are subject to restrictive covenants prohibiting a business use. The plaintiffs brought this action alleging that the neighborhood had so changed that the restrictions were inequitable and unreasonable and ought t-o be removed. Certain of the defendants filed cross-complaints containing similar allegations. The trial court entered judgment removing the re strictive covenants in so far as they affect the lots of the plaintiffs and of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Rombauer v. Compton Heights Christian ChurchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Peck v. ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. LevitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. Lebo v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API