Legal Opinion

Stewart v. McClung

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1885PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Linn County. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLore, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court requiring the appellant, an insolvent debtor, to surrender and deliver up to his assignee, for the benefit of his creditors, a *433gold watch and chain, valued by his evidence to be worth from fifty to seventy dollars. By his deed of assignment the appellant transferred to his assignee all his property except such as was exempt from execution, but without any specification of such exempt property. The contention of the appellant is, that a. watch and chain may be properly considered as an article “of wearing apparel,” and as such it is exempt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gooch v. GoochSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
  2. In re GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1871
  3. Bumpus v. MaynardNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  4. In re ThiellDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1868

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Childers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re MimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API