Legal Opinion

Julius v. Druckrey

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaiRChild, J.

The judgment under which the execution was issued was a valid judgment. Shawano Finance Corp. v. Julius, ante, p. 637, 254 N. W. 355. Therefore, the proceedings which attempted to vacate the judgment originally entered in this case were without effect, and the findings, conclusions, and judgment determining whether or not this automobile was exempt are now before us on appeal. No question arises as to the value of the automobile. It is agreed that its value is less than four hundred dollars, and the only dispute is in relation to whether the automobile was-used in the trade or business of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Lames v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In the Matter of Marie ERICKSON, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of DORCHESTER STATE BANKCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Eloff v. RieschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. MautheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re BogueUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API