Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Millington
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1923No. Civ. No. 2647PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The trial court made an order setting apart to the surviving husband of decedent certain articles as property of the estate exempt from execution. From this order the other beneficiaries under the will have appealed. Appellants contend that the court was without authority so to set apart the following: Two diamond rings of the value of $250; one set of diamond earrings, $200; and one gold watch and chain, $5. The estate of decedent was appraised at $25,513. She left no surviving children. By her will she gave her husband $5,000 and appellants, who are a niece and the letter’s son, all the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In re LeechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Chamboredon v. FayetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Sellers v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lebovitz v. Hagemeyer (In Re Lebovitz)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re GoldbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1986
- Turner v. Marshack (In Re Turner)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Los Angeles Finance Co. v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.