In re Graham
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
In bankruptcy. Petition by the bankrupt for an order directing the assignee to add to the list of exempt property set off to Mm, one family sewing machine, one silver watch, one single sleigh, one harness, one manufacturer’s sewing machine, one horse and one buggy.
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, District Judge.
I think that the family sewing machine is exempt, and the assignee should set it off to the bankrupt. Section 1, c. 192, Laws Wis. 1S60. The watch is not exempt by the state law, and does not properly come within the discretionary articles contemplated by section 14 of the bankrupt act. The bankrupt, it appears, had disposed of the sleigh, harness, and fnan-ufacturer’s sewing machine to one Hanlon, before the filing of the petition in tMs case, and it was not claimed that he had re-purchased them, so that he clearly has no right to them.
The bankrupt, about the 12th of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Turner v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Stewart v. McClungOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- In re JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1899
- Coffinberry v. MaddenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Bashinski v. TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902