Gooch v. Gooch
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Trover for a gold, watch.
1Opinion of the Court
Wells, J., orally.
— The plaintiff claims title under a will. The testator devised to him certain real estate and also bequeathed to him his “wearing apparel.” If the watch belongs to the plaintiff it must have been given by being included in the words “ wearing apparel.” It appears that the testator purchased the watch a few years before his death, and generally used it, by carrying it upon his person. Words used in wills are to be taken in their common and ordinary sense. The ordinary meaning of wearing apparel is vesture, garments, dress; that which is worn by or appropriated to the person.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- In Re MimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- In re the Estate of StiemesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- Stewart v. McClungOregon Supreme Court · 1885
- Neasham v. McNairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.