Legal Opinion
Wamstad v. Mangelsen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 2014No. 20130155PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Sandy Mangelsen appeals from a district court order finding he is a sexually dangerous individual and committing him to the care, custody, and control of the Executive Director of the Department of Human Services. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in finding the State established by clear and convincing evidence that Mangelsen is a sexually dangerous individual.
I
[¶ 2] Mangelsen’s first sexual offense occurred in South Dakota in August 2005, when he was 18 years old. Mangelsen touched the breast of a 13-year-old girl over her clothes, and touched the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Burdick v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Feland v. J.M.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Stokka v. Cass County Electric Cooperative, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Interest of CormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Grosinger v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Interest of WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. NgaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Potts v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.