Legal Opinion

Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 20, 2017No. A156752PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

Petitioner, an inmate serving a life sentence for murder, seeks review of a 2013 final order issued by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board). In its order, the board postponed petitioner’s parole release date for 10 years after finding that he suffered from a “present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community,” ORS 144.125(3)(a), and that it was “not reasonable to expect that [petitioner] would be granted parole” before 2023, the new date set by the board, ORS 144.280 (l)(b). Petitioner raises two assignments of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. MendacinoOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. United Academics of OSU v. OSUCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Contreras v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. King v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Hessel v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API