Legal Opinion
Clark v. McClurg
California Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11184PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration of this case, we are satisfied that our former opinion written by Mr. Chief Justice Waste correctly states the law applicable to the issues involved herein, and we hereby adopt the same as the final opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“In this action for damages, the first count of the complaint is based on an alleged slander asserted to have been uttered by the defendant of and concerning the plaintiff, while the second count sounds in libel. The jury brought in the following verdict: ‘We, the jury in the above-entitled action, find for the plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Wilson v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Courtney v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Childers v. San Jose Mercury Printing & Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Hoagland v. Forest Park Highlands Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.