Legal Opinion

Atowich v. Zimmer

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 12785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The appellants, husband and wife (plaintiffs below), entered into a contract with respondent Max Zimmer (one of the defendants below), hereinafter referred to as the contractor, wherein and whereby the latter agreed to erect and construct for plaintiffs a certain building and to remove and remodel another structure situated on the same premises, for the agreed sum of $23,400. The respondent Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland executed a bond in favor of plaintiffs containing the usual guaranties that all things incumbent upon the contractor would be done and performed in accordance with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Miller & Sons Co. v. Homeopathic Medical & Surgical Hospital & DispensarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Mannix v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re Kinney Aluminum Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  4. 1st Olympic Corp. v. HawrylukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API