Mannix v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The original complaint, as stated by respondent, set forth a cause of action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon the property therein described, for plastering the building thereon, under a contract between respondent and the original contractor, one J. W. Mitchell, and also against the owner, appellant Wilson, personally, on a “stop notice” served upon him pursuant to section 1184 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By a subsequent amendment another cause of action for the same debt is alleged against appellant, on a written guaranty which appellant gave re spondent for the payment by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hampton v. ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Moore v. KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railway Co. v. ScholesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leaf v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. HouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Atowich v. ZimmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Stephens v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Banducci v. Frank T. Hickey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.