Legal Opinion
Gill v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1932No. Docket No. 468PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
This action was brought by plaintiffs Thomas Edwin Gill and Myla Ritzinger Gill to recover from the Torrens title assurance fund in the custody of the state treasurer the value of certain lands in Imperial County described in the complaint and registered pursuant to the act commonly known as the Torrens Land Transfer Act, under the claim that plaintiffs purchased said land in reliance upon a certificate of title issued by the registrar of titles of Imperial County.
On January 1, 1916, Friend J. Austin and Lettie M. Austin, his wife, were the owners of the land in question.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Baillargeon v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Williams v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Cohen v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935