Legal Opinion

Gill v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1937No. Civ. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

—This is an action to recover compensation or damages under the assurance fund provisions of the Torrens Land Title Act (1915 Stats., p. 1932, Act 8589, Leering’s Gen. Laws).

One Austin brought a proceeding in the Superior Court of Imperial County on October 2, 1917, to have- a certain parcel of land registered under the Torrens Act, setting forth in his petition that a trust deed for $55,000 then held by a Nevada corporation had been fraudulently obtained and praying that 'the trust deed be canceled and the land registered under the act. The default of that corporation was entered on December…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Withers v. KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gill v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Trust One Mortgage Corp. v. Invest America Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. In re Land Registration for Lot No. 361, Inarajan, GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  4. Nineberg v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API