Legal Opinion
Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. Vick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 13, 1992No. 73757PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
The new administration building for the Noble Foundation in Ardmore was completed in August, 1984. Almost immediately the owners noticed signs that the foundation and slab had moved. This appeal deals only with the owner’s suit against the soil engineer, filed January 23, 1989, and specifically with whether the Foundation’s claims based on theories of breach of contract and/or professional negligence are barred by the statute of limitations. We hold that the District Court’s order dismissing the case on that basis was correct as to the tort aspect, but in error as to that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. HamillIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Owens v. BrochnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Greenberg v. WolfbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.