Legal Opinion
Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1995No. 81255PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
This is a suit by an automobile buyer against the company that sold him the car and the company’s owner. Plaintiff seeks, in the alternative, the remedies of rescission or damages for breach of warranty. He claims the defendants sold him a used car as new. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of both defendants, and plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed and we have granted certiorari. The judgment is affirmed as to the owner individually, but reversed and remanded as to the dealership.
Charles Seitsinger bought a car from Doc-kum Pontiac Inc. which the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hadnot v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Davis v. LeitnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. v. VickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.