Legal Opinion

Woods v. Prestwick House, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 2011No. 108,541PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.:

1 1 Title 12 00.98.2001 § 1449 1 protects individuals from the unauthorized use of the person's name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness. Two first impression questions are presented. The first involves the statute of limitations controlling the cause.

T2 To be governed by the three-year statute of limitations for Habilities created by statute, the lability must be one that does not exist but for the statutory provision. 2 We adopted the concept of misappropriation of another's name or likeness as the tort of invasion of privacy long before the Legislature's enactment of 12…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. CALVERT v. SWINFORDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Hitch Enterprises, Inc. v. Cimarex Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
  4. Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MoonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API