Legal Opinion

Weismiller Et Vir. v. Farrell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1943No. Appeals, 231 and 232PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, instituted trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained by the wife plaintiff on the evening of February 16, 1940, when she tripped upon a ridge of ice, concealed by a layer of snow, covering the sidewalk in front of defendants’ property in Pittsburgh. Verdicts were returned for the wife for $1,000, and the husband for $130. The court below entered judgment for defendants n.o.v., holding that the injured plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law, because she knew that the condition of the sidewalk was dangerous, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams v. GardinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Sorrentino v. GrazianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Cronmuller v. Evening TelegraphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Llewellyn v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Keiser v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Milburn v. Knights of Columbus Home Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Bowser Et Ux. v. Kuhn Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Stewart Et Vir v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API