Kulka v. Nemirovsky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
Plaintiff appeals from judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict for appellant in his action for personal injury. Defendant, engaged in buying and selling machinery, sold to one Condon a machine, known as a punch and shear, “as is, where is.” It was therefore necessary for Condon to remove the machine from its position in defendant’s store. Condon sent several workmen, plaintiff among them, all experienced in such work, to get the machine. The store was filled with machinery of various kinds, standing on each side of an aisle four or five feet wide,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pauckner v. WakemIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
- Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Reinoso, G. v. Heritage Warminster SPESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.