Legal Opinion

Stewart Et Vir v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1945No. Appeals, 147 and 148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellants, husband and wife, brought trespass to recover damages for injuries resulting from a fall sustained by wife plaintiff upon a public stairway maintained by defendant. The verdicts were for plaintiffs, but the court below entered the judgments n. o. v., from which these appeals were taken, in the belief that the evidence demonstrated as a matter of law the contributory negligence of wife plaintiff, hereinafter called plaintiff. In view of the verdicts, the record must be considered in the light most favorable to appellants, and oral testimony adverse to the theory…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Bruch v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Poch v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Zieg Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Chidester v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Garvin v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Balzer v. Reith Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Smith v. Sheraden BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API