Legal Opinion

Adams v. Gardiner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1932No. Appeal, 82PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Maxey,

This is an automobile collision case and the question before us is: Should the court below have entered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,855? Wissahickon Avenue runs practically north and south, and Rittenhouse Street east and west, in Philadelphia. Each street is thirty feet wide. On a clear dry mid-day on March 9, 1930, the plaintiff, accompanied by his wife and a friend, was driving a Ford sedan south on Wissahickon Avenue toward Rittenhouse Street, and the defendant, accompanied by his wife and cousin,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Goldberg v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Giles v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Altomari v. KrugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Radobersky v. Imperial Volunteer Fire DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Christ v. Hill Metal & Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API