Legal Opinion

Sorrentino v. Graziano

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1940No. Appeal, 284PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Peter Sorrentino, an employee of an independent contractor, obtained a verdict of $12,000 in this action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while employed upon the building owned by defendants, Anthony Graziano and Joseph Maggio, and in which they, as partners, conducted a laundry business, known as King Damp Wash Laundry. Upon the filing of a remittitur, reducing the verdict to $8,500, motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial were dismissed. Defendants have appealed.

In determining the question as to whether judgment n. o. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MymaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Nettis v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Schlesinger PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Gonzalez v. United States Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. HANKINS v. MacKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API