Legal Opinion

Bowser Et Ux. v. Kuhn Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1946No. Appeals, 39 and 40PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, recovered verdicts against the defendants for injuries sustained by the wife plaintiff when she fell on the ice and snow-covered sideAvalk of a property owned and occupied by the defendants. The lower court refused defendants’ motion for judgment n. o. v., and this appeal was taken.

Appellants contend that the record does not show that their negligence was the causative factor of the wife plaintiff’s injuries and that she was guilty of contributory negligence. In deciding both contentions we must read the testimony in the light most advantageous…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitton v. H. A. Gable Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Rea v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Puskarich v. Trustees of Zembo TempleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Garvin v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Lascoskie v. Berks County Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Whitaker v. HillsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API