Legal Opinion

Sasso v. Millbrook Enterprises, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1981PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leo F. McGinity, J.

This motion by plaintiffs for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 is granted.

The cross motion by defendants, Millbrook Enterprises, Inc., Andrew and Angeline De Lillo, Vincent De Lillo and Peter Napolitano, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them, is granted to the extent of dismissing the action against Angeline De Lillo and, in all other respects, is denied.

The plaintiff trustees have established by affidavit of Robert Sasso, one of the trustees of plaintiffs, and other documentary evidence:(a) in the first cause of action, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shellington v. . HowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Goldstein v. ManganoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  3. People v. TrappNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Johnson v. Clay Partition Co.New York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Excavators Union Local 731 Welfare Fund v. ZurmuhlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mullins v. VenableWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Calhoon v. BonnabelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. Stoganovic v. DinolfoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Courtney v. Brooklyn & Queens Allied Oil Burner Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  5. In Re NargassansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API