Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Clay Partition Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1977PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Sidney H. Asch, J.
The above-entitled action was tried pursuant to stipulation. Essentially, there is no dispute about the facts.
The plaintiffs in this action are trustees of five jointly managed trust funds created pursuant to the Taft-Hartley Act (US Code, tit 29, § 141 et seq.). The defendant, Rubin Zimmerman, is the president and majority shareholder of a defunct corporation known as Clay Partitions, Inc. Clay was a member *415of the Metropolitan New York Drywall Contractors Association, Inc., and as such was bound to the terms and conditions of collective bargaining…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brennan v. Emerald Renovators, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Barnes v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1972
- General Teleradio, Inc. v. ManutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jenkins v. J. C. Penney Casualty Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- Mullins v. VenableWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Mazur v. U. S. Air Duct Corp. (In Re U. S. Air Duct Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1981
- Calhoon v. BonnabelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Stoganovic v. DinolfoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.