Stoganovic v. Dinolfo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs, contract athletes who formerly played soccer for a now defunct team known as the Rochester Lancers which was owned by a corporation, Blue and Gold Ltd., commenced this action for unpaid wages under sections 198-a and 198-c of the Labor Law against defendant, the president of the corporation. Special Term granted the motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We agree. Article 6 of the Labor Law (§ 190 et seq.) provides the means by which employees may statutorily compel employers to pay wages and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Trimarco v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Goldstein v. ManganoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- People v. TrappNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Patrowich v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lauria v. HeffernanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Sasso v. VachrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Schear v. Food Scope America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chu Chung v. NEW SILVER PALACE RESTAURANT, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.