Legal Opinion
Lohnes v. ASTRON COMPUTER PRODUCTS
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 2001No. G025519PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
Intervener Crum & Forster appeals from a trial court’s order granting a motion to strike its complaint in intervention filed in an action against defendants Astron Computer Products and John Lee. Intervener contends the court abused its discretion. We agree and remand for further proceedings.
Facts
Plaintiff Mary Ellen Lohnes sued defendants for damages she sustained in an auto accident, which occurred almost a year earlier. Defendants answered, discovery commenced, and the court set a trial date. About two and one-half months before trial, intervener, plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Catello v. I.T.T. General ControlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. Frontier Pacific InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Bishop v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mar v. Sakti International Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marken v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Carlsbad Police Officers Assn. v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020