Legal Opinion
People v. Frontier Pacific Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 2000No. C033619PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Actimg P. J.
Frontier Pacific Insurance Company (Frontier), appeals from a motion denying the exoneration of bail and a summary judgment entered against it following the forfeiture of a bail bond in the amount of $18,334. (Pen. Code, §§ 1305, 1306.)
On appeal, Frontier contends the trial court lost jurisdiction to declare a forfeiture by failing to do so at the first hearing at which the defendant failed to appear and the trial court lost jurisdiction upon the running of the statutory period. Upon the court’s own motion, supplemental briefing was requested on the issue whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- County of Los Angeles v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. Bankers Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.