Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Silva
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 1, 1991No. H007577PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Plaintiff brought a third party tort action for injuries sustained during the course and scope of his employment. The workers’ compensation carrier for plaintiff’s employer intervened. When plaintiff’s suit was dismissed under Code of Civil Procedure section 583.250 1 for failure to effect timely service under section 583.210, plaintiff sought unsuccessfully to intervene back into the lawsuit pursuant to Labor Code section 3853.
Plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his action and the denial of his motion for leave to intervene. We affirm as to both.
Factual and Procedural…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Selma Trailer & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ippolito v. Mun. Court for Los Angeles Judicial Dist. of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Jordan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- MAGINN v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mar v. Sakti International Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Shipley v. SugitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lohnes v. ASTRON COMPUTER PRODUCTSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- TORREY HILLS COMMUNITY COALITION v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.