Mar v. Sakti International Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1782Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
If an employee injured in the course of his or her employment by a third party commences an action against that third party, Labor Code section 3853 grants the employee’s employer an unconditional right to intervene in the action “at any time before trial on the facts.” (la) We hold that if an employer makes a pretrial motion to become a party to such a pending action, the employer has, as a matter of law, satisfied the “upon timely application” requirement in Code of Civil Procedure section 387 governing intervention in general.1
Background
In November of 1989 Kingsley Mar was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Selma Trailer & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bishop v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Poway Unified School Dist. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In Re Social Services Payment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lin v. City of PleasantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mergen v. Northern States Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.