Legal Opinion
Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 13, 1977PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, J.
The defendant state employees’ retirement commission denied the plaintiff her request to change retirement plans, and she sought judicial review of this decision through the appeal provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (chapter 54 of the General Statutes, hereinafter referred to as the UAPA). The com*463mission filed a plea in abatement claiming that the plaintiff was not entitled to judicial review pursuant to the UAPA and that the Court of Common Pleas was without jurisdiction to hear the case. The plaintiff has appealed from the court’s judgment sustaining the plea in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lawrence v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.