Legal Opinion
Donis v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in Podiatry
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 7, 1988No. 13346PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether the department of health services (department) was a party of record to the administrative proceeding which is the subject of this appeal, so that the plaintiffs failure to cite and serve the department, as required by General Statutes § 4-183 (b) of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), rendered his appeal to the Superior Court jurisdictionally defective.1 We agree with the court that the department was a party of record to the administrative proceeding involved and find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s appeal for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Royce v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Basilicato v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Borough of Newtown v. Department of Public Utility ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Hillcroft Partners v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Catholic Family & Community Services v. Commission on Human RightsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawai'i, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
- McQuillan v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Shapiro v. CarothersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- DelVecchio v. Department of Income MaintenanceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Fleischman v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.