Legal Opinion

Aughenbaugh v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1990No. SC S36843PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*512UNIS, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioner challenges a revised ballot title certified by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State. We review the ballot title for “substantial compliance” with the requirements of ORS 250.0351 and 250.039.2 ORS 250.085(4). Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), petitioner filed with the Secretary of State timely written comments concerning the Attorney General’s original certified ballot title. Petitioner is, therefore, entitled to bring this proceeding. ORS 250.085(2) and (5). We modify the challenged ballot title.

The Attorney General certified the following…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Sampson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bernard v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bartsch v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API