Legal Opinion

Greene v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1995No. SC S42079PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*171DURHAM, J.

This is an original proceeding in which petitioner challenges the ballot title for a proposed initiative measure. Petitioner is an elector who submitted timely written comments about the Attorney General’s draft ballot title, pursuant to ORS 250.067(1). Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to seek a different title in this court. ORS 250.085(2) (1993). Petitioner’s arguments restate those that she made to the Secretary of State during the administrative process. ORS 250.085(6). We modify the ballot title and certify it to the Secretary of State.

The measure in question would repeal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Reed v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Acocella v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Nelson v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Mabon v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API