State v. Marsh
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(a). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to give a “choice of evils” jury instruction. The state asserts that the evidence did not support such an instruction. We agree with the state and affirm.
‘We review a trial court’s refusal to give a requested jury instruction for error as a matter of law,” State v. Moore, 324 Or 396, 427, 927 P2d 1073 (1996), and we review “the evidence in support of the instruction in the light most favorable to defendant, the party seeking the instruction,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. SeamonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. WhismanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ferguson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. OneillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. NebelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. PusztaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.