Legal Opinion

State v. Nebel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 2010No. 06FE0164; A136957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree assault. ORS 163.185 (2007). He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to give jury instructions to support his defense that he was justified in using deadly force to protect himself and others. The state concedes that the trial court’s stated reason for refusing to give the instructions was erroneous but argues that the trial court’s refusal to give those instructions was nonetheless correct because defendant’s requested instructions did not correctly state the applicable law. We affirm.

We review a trial court’s refusal to give…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Williams v. Philip Morris Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. OneillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. City of Eugene v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. BrackenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. BrackenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. Mosqueda-Rivera-BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API