Legal Opinion

State v. Oneill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2013No. 081255480; A143742PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant was convicted of escape in the third degree, ORS 162.145(1), for fleeing the custody of arresting officers. On appeal, she assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to give a jury instruction on the choice of evils defense when there was evidence that she perceived an imminent threat of sexual abuse by the officers. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1

We review a trial court’s refusal to give a jury instruction for legal error and state the facts that support giving the instruction in the light most favorable to the party who requested it. State v. Nebel, 237 Or App 30, 32, 238…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Powell v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. ClowdusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API