Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 2007No. 160417745; A130544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of defendant. They argue that the trial court erred by denying their motions to amend and to postpone trial, by giving two jury instructions, and by failing to give eight jury instructions. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying plaintiffs’ motions and that the two given instructions to which plaintiffs assign error are not erroneous as a matter of law. We further conclude that the record before us does not permit us to meaningfully review whether the trial court erred by declining to give eight…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. York v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Elam v. SoaresOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Eugene v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. King City Realty, Inc. v. Sunpace Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schrodt v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Dorn v. Three Rivers School Dist.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. In re IbarraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. OlstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API