Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. CF-91-96; CA A70731PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a weapon by an inmate, ORS 166.275, 1 and attempted assault in the second degree, ORS 163.175. 2 He assigns error to the court’s refusal to give jury instructions on the defenses of self-defense and choice of evils. He also assigns error to the court’s order that he be shackled during trial. We reverse.

ORS 161.209 describes the circumstances in which a person may use physical force for self-defense:

“Except as provided in ORS 161.215 and 161.219, a person is justified in using physical force upon another person for self-defense or to defend a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. MerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. LoewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. State v. AverittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API