Legal Opinion

State v. Boldt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1992No. 911509; CA A71868PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for failing to appear. ORS 162.205. He argues that the trial court erred when it refused to give his requested jury instructions on the defenses of choice of evils 1 and duress. 2 We reverse.

After being charged with delivery of a controlled substance, defendant was released on the condition that he appear in court on May 21, 1991. When he appeared on that day, he was ordered to appear again on June 14,1991, which he failed to do. At his trial on the failure to appear charge, defendant testified that he did not appear because, during the first week in June, he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. WhismanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. DewhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. FreihCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. State v. SeamonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API