Mantel v. Mantel
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing to set aside a judgment. S. P. Hall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Motion to dismiss the appeal. Judgment was entered herein in favor of the plaintiff, February 18, 1901. August 9, 1901, the defendant moved the court for an order setting aside the judgment, on the ground that no findings or conclusions of law had been made or filed in the cause, the same not having been waived. An order denying this motion was made and entered by the court, August 14, 1901. From this order the present appeal has been taken. The facts presented herein are within the rule declared in Reay v. Butler, 69 Cal. 572; Goyhinech v. Goyhinech, 80 Cal. 409; Estate of Gregory,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Goyhinech v. GoyhinechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In re Estate of GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bell v. SolomonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lantz v. ValCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Payne v. PullanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Home Owners' Etc. Corp. v. EngelbertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.